<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wake Up, The Medium IS The Message!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jonathanfields.com/blog/wake-up-the-medium-is-the-message/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jonathanfields.com/blog/wake-up-the-medium-is-the-message/</link>
	<description>Innovation, Creativity, Entrepreneurship, Personal Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:21:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: esther</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanfields.com/blog/wake-up-the-medium-is-the-message/#comment-3557</link>
		<dc:creator>esther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 21:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanfields.com/blog/?p=333#comment-3557</guid>
		<description>this reminded me of a quote (voltaire i think): &quot;I present myself in a form suitable to the relationship i wish to achieve with you.&quot;  i can well believe that presentation shapes what is received, be it written message or personal behavior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this reminded me of a quote (voltaire i think): &#8220;I present myself in a form suitable to the relationship i wish to achieve with you.&#8221;  i can well believe that presentation shapes what is received, be it written message or personal behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Miles</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanfields.com/blog/wake-up-the-medium-is-the-message/#comment-3554</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 13:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanfields.com/blog/?p=333#comment-3554</guid>
		<description>The interactions between writer (or speaker), written (or spoken) and reader (or listener) are complex. The analysis of such interactions is a field in itself. As others here have written, it is hard to control the meanings that flow between these entities. But as writers we continue to try!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The interactions between writer (or speaker), written (or spoken) and reader (or listener) are complex. The analysis of such interactions is a field in itself. As others here have written, it is hard to control the meanings that flow between these entities. But as writers we continue to try!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zania</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanfields.com/blog/wake-up-the-medium-is-the-message/#comment-3552</link>
		<dc:creator>zania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 11:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanfields.com/blog/?p=333#comment-3552</guid>
		<description>Yes, your post made it clear that you would change your message according to your perceived audience.  I was simply saying which of the two addresses I would prefer.
I would also imagine, that if addressing an audience by talking to them, you would change the way you present the message throughout the talk, as you pick up more about your audience.
Of course you cannot do this with a book, or any written/typed medium, which would lead to more in depth research.

However, in calling your post &#039;Wake Up, The Medium IS The Message!&#039;, but at the same time, telling us that the medium and the message are not identical, rather that the medium becomes a fundamental part of the message (rather than the whole), you were subtly altering our perceptions of your post ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, your post made it clear that you would change your message according to your perceived audience.  I was simply saying which of the two addresses I would prefer.<br />
I would also imagine, that if addressing an audience by talking to them, you would change the way you present the message throughout the talk, as you pick up more about your audience.<br />
Of course you cannot do this with a book, or any written/typed medium, which would lead to more in depth research.</p>
<p>However, in calling your post &#8216;Wake Up, The Medium IS The Message!&#8217;, but at the same time, telling us that the medium and the message are not identical, rather that the medium becomes a fundamental part of the message (rather than the whole), you were subtly altering our perceptions of your post <img src='http://www.jonathanfields.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Fields</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanfields.com/blog/wake-up-the-medium-is-the-message/#comment-3551</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Fields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 10:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanfields.com/blog/?p=333#comment-3551</guid>
		<description>@ Everyone - great discussion, gang!  A few quick thoughts (pre-coffee).  

One, on writing &quot;achievement requires action,&quot; instead of the longer sentence, I should probably qualify my thoughts a bit better.  

I would actually not automatically default to on or the other.  Rather, I&#039;d look at the nature of the market I am writing to and choose the expression most likely to convey the message in the way I believed that market would be most likely to experience the way I want it experienced.

When I write, I often create a mental mock-up of a person to write to.  And, depending on the intended use of the content, I&#039;ll sometimes invest a substantial amount of time in researching the preferences, emotions and experiences of that person. I do this less here on the blog, but for copywriting or marketing, it is a fundamental piece of the puzzle.

Two, I am not saying the medium and the message are identical.  I AM saying the medium has such a strong influence on the fundamental expression of the message that it literally alters the experience of the message and, in doing so, it becomes a part of the message.

So, the real take-away here is to invest yourself in the details of how you (a) express, (b) package and (c) distribute your message, because those elements don&#039;t just ride along with your message, they shape your message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Everyone &#8211; great discussion, gang!  A few quick thoughts (pre-coffee).  </p>
<p>One, on writing &#8220;achievement requires action,&#8221; instead of the longer sentence, I should probably qualify my thoughts a bit better.  </p>
<p>I would actually not automatically default to on or the other.  Rather, I&#8217;d look at the nature of the market I am writing to and choose the expression most likely to convey the message in the way I believed that market would be most likely to experience the way I want it experienced.</p>
<p>When I write, I often create a mental mock-up of a person to write to.  And, depending on the intended use of the content, I&#8217;ll sometimes invest a substantial amount of time in researching the preferences, emotions and experiences of that person. I do this less here on the blog, but for copywriting or marketing, it is a fundamental piece of the puzzle.</p>
<p>Two, I am not saying the medium and the message are identical.  I AM saying the medium has such a strong influence on the fundamental expression of the message that it literally alters the experience of the message and, in doing so, it becomes a part of the message.</p>
<p>So, the real take-away here is to invest yourself in the details of how you (a) express, (b) package and (c) distribute your message, because those elements don&#8217;t just ride along with your message, they shape your message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zania</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanfields.com/blog/wake-up-the-medium-is-the-message/#comment-3549</link>
		<dc:creator>zania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 07:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanfields.com/blog/?p=333#comment-3549</guid>
		<description>Hi Jonathan,
Interesting discussion.
Yes, the way we package our message is important and will vary according to our audience.
And I agree that the way the message is presented can affect the audience&#039;s perception of that message, or, at least, it can affect how the audience perceives the message before they actually read it and to some extent, afterwards).
And therefore the medium will affect how many people actually receive the message in the first place.

However, no one in that audience will receive the message the same way, however it is conveyed, as they will bring their life experiences to bear, not only on the medium, but the message itself.
That&#039;s when it gets even more complicated...

And I prefer &#039;achievement requires action&#039; too.  It actually makes me think more than the longer example :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jonathan,<br />
Interesting discussion.<br />
Yes, the way we package our message is important and will vary according to our audience.<br />
And I agree that the way the message is presented can affect the audience&#8217;s perception of that message, or, at least, it can affect how the audience perceives the message before they actually read it and to some extent, afterwards).<br />
And therefore the medium will affect how many people actually receive the message in the first place.</p>
<p>However, no one in that audience will receive the message the same way, however it is conveyed, as they will bring their life experiences to bear, not only on the medium, but the message itself.<br />
That&#8217;s when it gets even more complicated&#8230;</p>
<p>And I prefer &#8216;achievement requires action&#8217; too.  It actually makes me think more than the longer example <img src='http://www.jonathanfields.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren Whitlock</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanfields.com/blog/wake-up-the-medium-is-the-message/#comment-3548</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren Whitlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 04:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanfields.com/blog/?p=333#comment-3548</guid>
		<description>Of course the medium in the message.

I can see where there is some confusion. Selling books (or anything) is not always about the content, medium or message.

Marketing is about fulfilling the wants and desires or your customers (readers) and giving them the experience they want.

You can&#039;t measure the value of a book by the number of words in it, and you can&#039;t judge a message by the medium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course the medium in the message.</p>
<p>I can see where there is some confusion. Selling books (or anything) is not always about the content, medium or message.</p>
<p>Marketing is about fulfilling the wants and desires or your customers (readers) and giving them the experience they want.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t measure the value of a book by the number of words in it, and you can&#8217;t judge a message by the medium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GirlPie</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanfields.com/blog/wake-up-the-medium-is-the-message/#comment-3546</link>
		<dc:creator>GirlPie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 23:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanfields.com/blog/?p=333#comment-3546</guid>
		<description>Personally, I prefer the progressive and inspiring &quot;achievement requires action&quot; over the long-winded and naggy &quot;if you want something in life, stop bitching about it, get off your ass and DO something to get what you want. Thinking, dreaming and talking simply aren’t enough.”

However, to your point of &quot;medium is [partly the] message&quot; -- I&#039;d suggest that the size and permanence and historic use of the book form says different things about your content, before I ever read a word, than does an eBook or a magazine-formatted series of chapters... we think about a feature film on the big screen differently than we do a TV-movie... so yes, packaging the content IS an aspect of the content.  At least in my biz it is.  Thanks for starting the smart discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I prefer the progressive and inspiring &#8220;achievement requires action&#8221; over the long-winded and naggy &#8220;if you want something in life, stop bitching about it, get off your ass and DO something to get what you want. Thinking, dreaming and talking simply aren’t enough.”</p>
<p>However, to your point of &#8220;medium is [partly the] message&#8221; &#8212; I&#8217;d suggest that the size and permanence and historic use of the book form says different things about your content, before I ever read a word, than does an eBook or a magazine-formatted series of chapters&#8230; we think about a feature film on the big screen differently than we do a TV-movie&#8230; so yes, packaging the content IS an aspect of the content.  At least in my biz it is.  Thanks for starting the smart discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanfields.com/blog/wake-up-the-medium-is-the-message/#comment-3543</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 19:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanfields.com/blog/?p=333#comment-3543</guid>
		<description>Jonathan,

I feel like there are mixed metaphors here.

The medium is a vehicle for the message. It isn&#039;t the message.

This does NOT in any way change the fact that &quot;God is in the details,&quot; as Mies van der Rohe said. I love Eames&#039; quotation, also.

The message should be both well-crafted and finely tuned to your chosen medium. Your book should be the best book you can create, not a book that feels like it was once a PowerPoint or a blog article.

I picked up a book by [well respected marketers who also blog] not too long ago, and was appalled to realize that 90% of what was in it was straight from their blog. 

It wasn&#039;t so much that I&#039;d read it all before (irritating), as it was that a blog article does not usually have the depth or the permanence to belong, verbatim, in a work I pay 35 bucks for. If the thoughts are sound enough for a book, great. They still must be expanded, tweaked, and crafted to suit the medium. It felt like their editor decided to take a weekend and put together a book to scam folks, knowing that our collective standard for writing has changed somewhat in the era of blogs.

The medium certainly affects the message, as you say. I think a message CAN be repurposed, but I despise &quot;good enough&quot; mentality and I definitely think that at each moment, the message should be tuned again to the vehicle you choose, not just shoved into a medium it&#039;s not suited to. 

“Achievement requires action.” Look, you said it again without saying it! A great work in any medium requires focus, craft, detail-orientation. We all need to be reminded of that.

Regards,

Kelly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan,</p>
<p>I feel like there are mixed metaphors here.</p>
<p>The medium is a vehicle for the message. It isn&#8217;t the message.</p>
<p>This does NOT in any way change the fact that &#8220;God is in the details,&#8221; as Mies van der Rohe said. I love Eames&#8217; quotation, also.</p>
<p>The message should be both well-crafted and finely tuned to your chosen medium. Your book should be the best book you can create, not a book that feels like it was once a PowerPoint or a blog article.</p>
<p>I picked up a book by [well respected marketers who also blog] not too long ago, and was appalled to realize that 90% of what was in it was straight from their blog. </p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t so much that I&#8217;d read it all before (irritating), as it was that a blog article does not usually have the depth or the permanence to belong, verbatim, in a work I pay 35 bucks for. If the thoughts are sound enough for a book, great. They still must be expanded, tweaked, and crafted to suit the medium. It felt like their editor decided to take a weekend and put together a book to scam folks, knowing that our collective standard for writing has changed somewhat in the era of blogs.</p>
<p>The medium certainly affects the message, as you say. I think a message CAN be repurposed, but I despise &#8220;good enough&#8221; mentality and I definitely think that at each moment, the message should be tuned again to the vehicle you choose, not just shoved into a medium it&#8217;s not suited to. </p>
<p>“Achievement requires action.” Look, you said it again without saying it! A great work in any medium requires focus, craft, detail-orientation. We all need to be reminded of that.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Kelly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shama Hyder</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanfields.com/blog/wake-up-the-medium-is-the-message/#comment-3541</link>
		<dc:creator>Shama Hyder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 18:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanfields.com/blog/?p=333#comment-3541</guid>
		<description>Jonathan, my boy, I believe the medium SPEAKS volumes about the message-but may not necessary be the exact same as the message.

= )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan, my boy, I believe the medium SPEAKS volumes about the message-but may not necessary be the exact same as the message.</p>
<p>= )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hayden Tompkins</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanfields.com/blog/wake-up-the-medium-is-the-message/#comment-3540</link>
		<dc:creator>Hayden Tompkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 17:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanfields.com/blog/?p=333#comment-3540</guid>
		<description>Which reminds me...  I read an article (I wish I could remember where!) in which the blogger stated that he wanted an ugly blog with uninspiring articles.  That way, people clicked on his ads instead of additional articles - and he makes bank off of that money.

What you are describing means that you have integrity regarding your ideas, articles, and products.  No way is that a bad thing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which reminds me&#8230;  I read an article (I wish I could remember where!) in which the blogger stated that he wanted an ugly blog with uninspiring articles.  That way, people clicked on his ads instead of additional articles &#8211; and he makes bank off of that money.</p>
<p>What you are describing means that you have integrity regarding your ideas, articles, and products.  No way is that a bad thing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

